<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for a gross salute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradkozlek.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradkozlek.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:14:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on it is about connecting people by &#8220;Blogging is not a thing, it’s an attitude&#8221; &#124; a gross salute</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/it-is-about-connecting-people/#comment-11534</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Blogging is not a thing, it’s an attitude&#8221; &#124; a gross salute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1963#comment-11534</guid>
		<description>[...] The internet is about connecting people, not creating a repository of information.    Posted in Uncategorized  &#124; Leave a comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The internet is about connecting people, not creating a repository of information.    Posted in Uncategorized  | Leave a comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on no more front doors by dave</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/no-more-front-doors/#comment-10029</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=2086#comment-10029</guid>
		<description>Smart observations, Brad. I&#039;ve often wondered about the view that &quot;deep linking&quot; was a problem. I always thought it was a convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart observations, Brad. I&#8217;ve often wondered about the view that &#8220;deep linking&#8221; was a problem. I always thought it was a convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The fantastical possibilities of yesteryear by Natalie Harp</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/the-fantastical-possibilities-of-yesteryear/#comment-9613</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Harp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=2039#comment-9613</guid>
		<description>I recently went on a trip to West Virginia where I stayed at a pretty remote location. Being disconnected was kind of a blessing. I brought my iPad and was still able to get a bit of reading done. There are advantages to disaggregated content that is not connected to the rest of the world of information. One is that distractions are minimized. I really think there is a danger in information overload with the idea of constant connection. Technology has evolved quite a bit obviously, but the human brain not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently went on a trip to West Virginia where I stayed at a pretty remote location. Being disconnected was kind of a blessing. I brought my iPad and was still able to get a bit of reading done. There are advantages to disaggregated content that is not connected to the rest of the world of information. One is that distractions are minimized. I really think there is a danger in information overload with the idea of constant connection. Technology has evolved quite a bit obviously, but the human brain not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on wpengine by Austin Gunter</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/wpengine/#comment-9141</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Gunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1997#comment-9141</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article, man.  We&#039;re glad you&#039;re liking us so far, but keep us posted on what you think about the platform, as well as what sorts of features you may have been expecting, but aren&#039;t present yet.  We&#039;d love to build them.

We&#039;ve worked on the WP Engine platform to take all the amazing things that the core team has done with WordPress and then add robust developer features for folks who need amazingly scalable and secure sites.  

Keep us posted on progress, and don&#039;t hesitate to let me know if I can help you decide either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article, man.  We&#8217;re glad you&#8217;re liking us so far, but keep us posted on what you think about the platform, as well as what sorts of features you may have been expecting, but aren&#8217;t present yet.  We&#8217;d love to build them.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve worked on the WP Engine platform to take all the amazing things that the core team has done with WordPress and then add robust developer features for folks who need amazingly scalable and secure sites.  </p>
<p>Keep us posted on progress, and don&#8217;t hesitate to let me know if I can help you decide either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A place to dump your stuff by bradk</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/a-place-to-dump-your-stuff/#comment-9030</link>
		<dc:creator>bradk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1989#comment-9030</guid>
		<description>Good point. What I was thinking was along the lines of two models: blogs and traditional websites. A traditional website would be personal, organizational, institutional sites that follow a more static, page-based model that was prevelant before the advent of blogging, and is still popular today. I am not thinking of non-blog sites like Wikipedia, google docs, amazon. I was thinking that in many cases, the traditional websites would better serve their audience and their authors if they were blogs. Websites outside of these two models I cosider beyond this scope this post.

The pope idea was perhaps a silly way to make my point. 

I would also argue that all tv shows and movies do function the same, but luckily the all things n the we do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. What I was thinking was along the lines of two models: blogs and traditional websites. A traditional website would be personal, organizational, institutional sites that follow a more static, page-based model that was prevelant before the advent of blogging, and is still popular today. I am not thinking of non-blog sites like Wikipedia, google docs, amazon. I was thinking that in many cases, the traditional websites would better serve their audience and their authors if they were blogs. Websites outside of these two models I cosider beyond this scope this post.</p>
<p>The pope idea was perhaps a silly way to make my point. </p>
<p>I would also argue that all tv shows and movies do function the same, but luckily the all things n the we do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A place to dump your stuff by ejp10</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/a-place-to-dump-your-stuff/#comment-9022</link>
		<dc:creator>ejp10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1989#comment-9022</guid>
		<description>This is sort of a meta-comment, but when I see a state,emt that we should have the &quot;dispensation of the pope&quot; to diverge from a particularl publishing model, I get a little worried about how we are exploring the possibilities of different technologies.

I wouldn&#039;t want all my TV shows, movies or books to look or function the same. I hope my novel reading is a different experience from looking up a word in the dictionary and that watching a sitcom is different from watching a PBS documentary.

Why shouldn&#039;t we expect that there should be different publishing models/experiences on the Web as well?

My two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sort of a meta-comment, but when I see a state,emt that we should have the &#8220;dispensation of the pope&#8221; to diverge from a particularl publishing model, I get a little worried about how we are exploring the possibilities of different technologies.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t want all my TV shows, movies or books to look or function the same. I hope my novel reading is a different experience from looking up a word in the dictionary and that watching a sitcom is different from watching a PBS documentary.</p>
<p>Why shouldn&#8217;t we expect that there should be different publishing models/experiences on the Web as well?</p>
<p>My two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Next Content Management System by wpengine &#124; a gross salute</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/the-next-content-management-system/#comment-9014</link>
		<dc:creator>wpengine &#124; a gross salute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1978#comment-9014</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Tim Owens for pointing me to wpengine in a comment on my previous post about Squarespace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Tim Owens for pointing me to wpengine in a comment on my previous post about Squarespace. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Next Content Management System by bradk</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/the-next-content-management-system/#comment-9012</link>
		<dc:creator>bradk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1978#comment-9012</guid>
		<description>Wow! I had not heard of wpengine. Very cool. I&#039;m digging in to their offering now. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! I had not heard of wpengine. Very cool. I&#8217;m digging in to their offering now. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Next Content Management System by Tim Owens</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/the-next-content-management-system/#comment-8964</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1978#comment-8964</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right that Wordpress is ripe for innovation and the hosting side is the weak link for folks that need more than Wordpress.com offers, but find the self-hosted solution overwhelming. One potential wildcard could be a service like WP Engine http://wpengine.com/ which just recently received 1.2 million in funding (and Automattic was one of the investors). For developers invested in the software and plugin/theme ecosystem it could be a way to tie that back to a stable backend without losing functionality. Either way we all win with more options on the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that WordPress is ripe for innovation and the hosting side is the weak link for folks that need more than WordPress.com offers, but find the self-hosted solution overwhelming. One potential wildcard could be a service like WP Engine <a href="http://wpengine.com/" rel="nofollow">http://wpengine.com/</a> which just recently received 1.2 million in funding (and Automattic was one of the investors). For developers invested in the software and plugin/theme ecosystem it could be a way to tie that back to a stable backend without losing functionality. Either way we all win with more options on the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Next Content Management System by bradk</title>
		<link>http://bradkozlek.com/2012/04/the-next-content-management-system/#comment-8960</link>
		<dc:creator>bradk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradkozlek.com/?p=1978#comment-8960</guid>
		<description>I think squarespace might threaten Wordpress as the go-to tool for more traditional websites, the kind of website a business hires a local designer to make for them. 

I am thinking of squarespace as a replacement for buying and hosting your own, so the cost isn&#039;t that high, especially if you start factoring in your time and the fact that I imagine a squarespace site would withstand something like a link from daring fireball. 

I don&#039;t know what the future holds, but I think there is major room for the self-hosted Wordpress model to be shaken up. Maybe it will be squarespace, maybe something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think squarespace might threaten WordPress as the go-to tool for more traditional websites, the kind of website a business hires a local designer to make for them. </p>
<p>I am thinking of squarespace as a replacement for buying and hosting your own, so the cost isn&#8217;t that high, especially if you start factoring in your time and the fact that I imagine a squarespace site would withstand something like a link from daring fireball. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the future holds, but I think there is major room for the self-hosted WordPress model to be shaken up. Maybe it will be squarespace, maybe something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.456 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-18 02:53:17 -->

